Academic Integrity
Ryerson University's Student Code of Academic Conduct
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
PENALTIES AND CONSEQUENCES FOR ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
APPEALS PROCESS
GENERAL REGULATION
A. ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
Academic misconduct includes actions that have a negative effect on the integrity of the learning environment. Offences of this nature are unacceptable. As academic misconduct can take many forms the following examples are
provided for descriptive purposes and are not intended to constitute an exhaustive list.
| A1. | Academic Dishonesty: Academic dishonesty is any deliberate attempt to gain advantage by deceiving faculty, placement managers/coordinators, preceptors or other professionals who are mentoring students, other students or the University administration. Academic dishonesty may involve an individual or a group, and includes but is not limited to the following offences: |
| |
| A2. | Contributing to Academic Misconduct -
knowingly assisting someone to commit any form of academic misconduct
is itself academic misconduct. This may include, but is not limited to:
|
| A3. | Damaging, Tampering or Interfering with the Scholarly Environment
- obstructing and/or disturbing the academic activities of others. This
involves altering the academic work of others in order to gain academic
advantage. [Some types of damaging or tampering fall under the Student
Code of Non-Academic Conduct (Policy 61)].
|
| A4. | Unauthorized Copying or Use of Copyrighted Materials
– intentionally failing to abide by the Copyright Act and/or the
University’s license agreement with Access, the Canadian Copyright
licensing agency regarding the copying and use of textbooks, software,
and other copyrighted materials (see the Ryerson Library website or the
Access website for details). |
| A5. | Violations of Departmental Policies on Professional Behaviour
– exhibiting unprofessional behaviour in field placements and
practicums as outlined in department/school Student Codes of
Professional Conduct. |
| A6. | Violations of Specific Departmental or Course Requirements
- In their course outlines, instructors may, in order to ensure
Academic Integrity, include additional specific requirements that are
consistent with this policy. Any additions must be published in course
outlines and or student handbooks. |
B. PENALTIES AND CONSEQUENCES FOR ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
| B1. | Definitions (Further information is found in section B4.
|
| B2. | Assignment of Penalties: Although
students may commit similar infractions, the circumstances surrounding
these infractions may vary. The penalty imposed shall take into account
the specific circumstances. Once it has been determined that academic
misconduct has occurred, a formal charge must be filed and one or more
of the following penalties must be imposed or recommended by the
instructor or Chair/Director: (See Procedures for the format of the
notification.) In addition to a penalty, students may be assigned the
educational component of the Academic Integrity Tutorial (See Procedures
section IE).
|
| B3. | Conditions – The Academic Integrity
Council or the Senate Appeals Committee may impose such conditions as
may be warranted (e.g. counselling). The Academic Integrity Officer will
monitor the implementation of such conditions |
| B4. | Consequences
|
2 Disciplinary Suspension (DS) cannot be assigned to graduate students.
3 If after reviewing the matter, a decision-maker determines that a charge of Academic Misconduct is not warranted, the educational component of the Academic Integrity Tutorial may be assigned to educate the student in order to prevent similar circumstances from arising in the future.
C. APPEALS PROCESS
Students may appeal charges and/or penalties to the Academic Integrity Council and then, under some circumstances, to the Senate Appeals Committee
| C1. | Filling an Appeal
|
| C2. | Student Enrollment During Appeal Proces
Students may remain in class and may enrol for courses while their case is under appeal. If students are charged at the end of a semester and, due to the timing of the charge, a hearing cannot be scheduled until the next semester, students may enrol for courses and continue in their program until a final decision is rendered. If the decision results in a DS, a DW or Expulsion being imposed, the student will normally be dropped from all courses and the fees refunded. However, the Panel will have the discretion to determine whether the penalty will come into effect at the end of the previous term or at the end of the term in which the student is currently enrolled |
| C3. | Timeliness
Every effort will be made to ensure these proceedings are handled in an expeditious manner. Students may contact the Academic Integrity Officer when they are concerned about delays in the process. The AIO may dismiss charges when the University unduly delays the process |
| C4. | Conflict of Interest:
|
| C5. | Appeals Committee
|
| C6. | Hearings of the Academic Integrity Council or Senate Appeals Committe
|
| C7. | Decision
|
D. GENERAL REGULATION
| D1. | Notification: Students must be
notified of a suspicion of academic misconduct in a confidential and
timely manner. Students will receive all notifications via their Ryerson
email address. There are specific procedures for notification in the
Procedures Section following this Policy |
| D2. | Dropping a Course:
|
| D3. | Deferred Grade (DEF): If a final
grade for the course must be given while the charge of misconduct is
under investigation, a grade of DEF (Deferred) will be assigned. The
Registrar must be notified if a DEF grade is required. A final grade
must be assigned within one month of the assignment of the DEF |
| D4. | Meetings to Discuss Suspicion of Academic Misconduct:
Meetings to discuss a suspicion of academic misconduct are to be
non-adversarial dialogues to determine the facts of the situation.
Procedures for such meetings must reflect this basic principle. (See
Procedures for the ways in which discussions must be held.) If a student
fails to attend a scheduled meeting and does not contact the instructor
or facilitator to reschedule the meeting, the instructor shall proceed
without the student’s input |
| D5. | Reduction of Potential for Bia: No
decision-maker in the process should have knowledge of previous charges
of misconduct against the student. If such knowledge is unavoidable, it
should be disregarded in the decisionmaking process. Procedures for the
appeal of charges of misconduct must reflect this basic principle |
| D6. | Evidence of Misconduct:
|
| D7. | Re-assessment of Work by Someone Other Than the Original Instructor: All of the provisions of this policy will apply to work which is regraded (See Undergraduate Academic Consideration and Appeals Policy, and Graduate Student Academic Appeals Policy.) |
| D8. | Verification: Documents may be verified by the office of the Chair/Director, the Academic Integrity Officer or Senate. |
| D9. | Audio and Video Recording: Discussions and Hearings may not be audio or video recorded. |
| D10. | Procedures related to this policy shall be established by the Office of the Provost and Vice President Academic in consultation with the Academic Integrity Office and a student representative from RSU and CESAR, and shall be published annually at the start of the academic year. Interpretation of the procedures shall be the responsibility of the Academic Integrity Officer |
Excert from Policy 60.






