Welcome to the forty-seventh issue of The LTO Best Practices. Each month, the Learning & Teaching Office will be spotlighting a timely topic in education. This May, our topic is "Teaching in Mixed-Age Classrooms."
This issue is excerpted from our Teaching Tips document of the same name.
With a student body of over 40,000, Ryerson University’s diversity is one of its greatest strengths. Within this population, there are both traditional learners, usually thought of as students attending university full-time right after high school, and non-traditional learners, usually defined as older students returning to school after having spent time working or raising a family. These non-traditional learners may also be completing coursework on a part-time basis, while remaining in their jobs.
When traditional and non-traditional students share the same classroom, there are some differences to be aware of, as well as strategies that can help reduce any issues that might arise—being aware of the “potential problems and learning some strategies to address them, we as educators can create a dynamic, inclusive environment” (Bishop-Clark & Lynch, 1992).
Bishop-Clark and Lynch state that non-traditional learners are more likely to:
Non-traditional students are also more likely to find the library and more recent developments in education, such as learning management systems, intimidating or unfamiliar, and may require more support than traditional students in accessing them (Milheim, 2005).
These differences can have several effects on the classroom environment. For example, because older students may feel discomfort amongst younger students, this can affect their self-confidence and their belief in their ability to succeed (Bishop-Clark & Lynch, 1992) or to be accepted as students in the classroom (Kasworm, 2005).
Bishop-Clark and Lynch describe how younger students can be intimidated by older students, seeing it as “unfair that they must compete with someone who is more experienced and who is as grade conscious as an older student appears to be.” Older students, conversely, can see the traditional students as “immature, unmotivated, and unappreciative of the educational environment.” These issues can create a distance between the two groups, which can make it difficult to hold class discussions or have students work together (Bishop-Clark & Lynch, 1992).
Similarly, the different orientations that traditional and non-traditional learners can have toward the professor can cause resentment or outright hostility between student groups. As described by Bishop-Clark and Lynch, “what typically occurs is that the professor is unintentionally interacting and treating the two groups differently” (1992). Kasworm found the same, with faculty reporting that they had a “more respectful, appreciative attitude toward adult students” (2005).
When planning to teach in a mixed-age classroom, it is important to build an inclusive course from the top down. For instance, the curriculum should be “inclusive with regard to students’ cultural backgrounds, including those from marginalized groups.” The course design should create a balance that will satisfy both non-traditional learners’ preference for “learner-centered (flexible and responsive)” instructional activities and traditional learners’ desire for a more “teacher-centered (structured) learning environment” (Ross-Gordon, 2003).
Bishop-Clark and Lynch list four methods for reducing conflict between traditional and non-traditional learners.
The most important thing to keep in mind when teaching in a mixed-age classroom, is that the “instructor influences the character of the learning environment more than any other single factor. The climate should be one that results in the learners feeling accepted, respected, and supported” (Faust, 2002).
Both traditional and non-traditional students participated when they perceived the instructor’s teaching style as helpful, reassuring, relaxed, enthusiastic, and easy-going. A “tone of informality and mutual respect” was found to encourage participation. Behaviors that encourage participation include making eye contact with students, giving nods of approval, and adding supportive or encouraging comments. By showing consideration for the feelings of others, modeling inclusive attitudes, and providing students with a language of disagreement, instructors can provide students with a safe learning environment for expressing their opinions or making comments (Faust, 2002).
It is also important for instructors to “humanize the classroom” and reduce the feeling of isolation or anonymity between both students and instructor. By giving students the opportunity to get to know each other, students will become more comfortable contributing to class discussions (Faust, 2002). Howard, Short, and Clark suggest having students introduce themselves to one another, giving them nametags to wear early in the semester, and putting them into small collaborative learning groups where they can increase their familiarity with each other (1996).
Howard, James and Taylor provide the following additional suggestions for creating an interactive learning environment:
"The LTO Best Practices" is produced monthly by Michelle Schwartz, Research Associate at The Learning & Teaching Office of Ryerson University.
Do you have any thoughts, suggestions, or best practices that you would like to see appear in this newsletter? Please send all submissions to firstname.lastname@example.org. We look forward to including your contributions in our next issue!
Location: Kerr Hall West, room KHW373.
Phone: 416.979.5000 x6598